+ All Income Inequality Essays:
- Markets and Society
- Women’s Inequalities in the Workplace
- Frequency Distributions and Sampling
- Pepsi and Coca-Cola's Horizontal and Vertical Income Statement
- A Discourse on Inequality
- Balance Sheet and Income Statement Commentary
- 1980s: Household Income in the United States and Americans
- The Racial Inequality of Blacks and Asians in America
- Using the Data and Your Economic Knowledge, Assess the View That a Reduction in Income Tax Is the Best Way to Improve the Performance of the Uk Economy in Both the Short Run and Long Run.
- Effect of Gender Inequality on Economic Status
- Gender Inequality Affects the Health of Women
- Essay on Equality and Inequality in Their Eyes Were Watching God
- Has Work Become More Insecure and Unequal in Canada?
- Understanding Social Inequality
- Inequalities as Portrayed in the Media: a Gender Analysis
- An Article Review of 'Wealth Transmission and Inequality among Hunter-Gatherers'
- Relationship between Inequality and Financial Crisis
- The Impact of the Remittances in Latin America
- Economic Inequality in American Society
- The Impact of Criminal Sanctions on Racial Ethnic and Socioeconomic Inequality: An Analysis
- Gender Inequality in Hollywood
- The Societal Influences on the Educational Impact of Students
- American Inequality
- Urban Inequality
- Discuss The Nature Of, And Explanations For, Gender Inequalities In Society.
- Discuss and Provide Solutions on Inflation, Unemployment, Distribution of Income and Balance of Payments in the S.A. Context
- Wage Inequality Hurts the Whole Family
- Ethnicity Creates Inequality in the Labor Market
- Managerial Economics National Income
- Ways in Which Zimbabwe Has Tried to Address Gender Inequalities.
- Why Race and Gender Inequality Still Exist
- Examine the Argument That Social Identities Are Often Characterised by Inequality Based on Your Reading of Material in ‘Connected Lives’ and the Article the Act.
- Gender Inequality at the Workplace
- Analysis of Relationship Between Modes of Production and Gender Inequality
- Inequalities in Health
- Gender and Gender Inequality
- Analysis on Rebeca Keegan's Article on Racial Inequality in Media
- Understanding Social Factors in Health
- Women’s Inequality in the 20th Century
- Two Variable Inequalities
- Education and Income as Primary Factors of Disparitites
- Variable Cost and Net Operating Income
- Inequality of Women During 1840 to 1968
- Ethnic Inequality in Health Care
- Inequalities Of Health In Britain Today
- The Inequality Difference Between Females and Males Should Be Erradicated
- Use of Accelerated Depreciation Methods Allows Shifting of Income
- The Benefits and Drawbacks of Globalization
- Importance of income elasticity to firms
- Consequences of Inequality and the Ways in Which are Reproduced
- Gender inequality in Iran
- The Price of Inequality by Joseph E. Stiglitz
- Why Is Institutional Racism so Important to Our Understanding of Racial Inequalities in Britain Today?
- How Macroeconomic Issues Affect the Housing Industry
- Problems of Gender Inequality for Women in India and Other Countries
- Migration, Remittances, Inequality and Poverty the Philippines
- The Relationship between the Repo Rate, Disposable Income, Inflation and In Turn Economic Growth in South Africa
- How Has the Current Recession Affected Demand for Overseas Travel for Different Consumer Groups, Based on the Income Elasticity of Demand?
- wealth inequality in america
- Gender and Inequality in Australia
- Single Tier Company Income Tax System
- Inequality in Australia
- Read Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol
- Outline the Inequality Problems That Persist in Terms of Pay for Men and Women.
- Sociology Inequalities in Health and Illness
- Income Statements
- Gender Inequalities in Malawi
- Income Smoothing
- Gender Inequalities in the Roman Catholic Religion
- Socioeconomic Factors and the Health of Individuals
- Discuss Whether the Most Effective Way to Have Income and Wealth Equality Is to Tax Income More Progressively.
- Factors of Social Inequality
- Modernization of NTUC Income
- Residual Online Income and HubPages
- Social Problems Perpetuated
- Movements for Social Change in an Integrated Global Economy
- Sexual Inequality in the Workforce
- Inequality in the Justice System
- Wilkinson & Pickett's 'Spirit Level Book'
India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
Oxfam believes that this sharp rise in inequality in India – and in many countries around the world – is damaging, and that countries need to make an effort to curb it. Rising inequality will lead to slower poverty reduction, undermine the sustainability of economic growth, compound the inequalities between men and women, and drive inequalities in health, education and life chances.
For the third year running, the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2016has found “severe income disparity” to be one of the top global risks in the coming decade. A growing body of evidence has also demonstrated that economic inequality is associated with a range of health and social problems, such as mental illness and violent crime. This is true across both rich and poor countries. Inequality hurts everyone.
What can India do to reduce inequality?
The continued rise of economic inequality in India – and around the world – is not inevitable. It is the result of policy choices. Governments can start to reduce inequality by rejecting market fundamentalism, opposing the special interests of powerful elites, and changing the rules and systems that have led to where we are today. They need to implement reforms that redistribute money and power and level the playing field.
Specifically, there are two main areas where changes to policy could boost economic equality: taxation and social spending.
1. Progressive taxation, where corporations and the richest individuals pay more to the state in order to redistribute resources across society, is key. The role of taxation in reducing inequality has been clearly documented in OECD and developing countries. Tax can play a progressive role, or a regressive one, depending on the policy choices of the government.
2. Social spending, on public services such as education, health and social protection, is also important. Evidence from more than 150 countries – rich and poor, and spanning over 30 years – shows that overall, investment in public services and social protection can tackle inequality. Oxfam has for many years campaigned for free, universal public services.
Two key indicators are: how much has a government committed to spend on education, health and social protection? And how progressive are the spending levels? This chart shows the money India has spent on public services over the past eight years; the horizontal lines represent expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and vertical bars expenditure in rupees.
According to a forthcoming Oxfam report (to be published in 2017), India performs relatively poorly on both counts. Its total tax effort, currently at 16.7% of GDP, is low (about 53% of its potential) and the tax structure is not very progressive since direct taxes account for only a third of total taxes. South Africa, by comparison, raises 27.4% of GDP as taxes, 50% of which are direct taxes.
When it comes to the second indicator (levels and progressivity of social-sector spending), India compares less well. Only 3% of GDP goes towards education and only 1.1% towards health. South Africa spends more than twice as much on education (6.1%) and more than three times as much on health (3.7%). While it’s assessed as more unequal than India, South Africa rates much higher than India in its commitment to reducing inequality.
The dream of ending poverty
Oxfam has calculated that if India stops inequality from rising further, it could end extreme poverty for 90 million people by 2019. If it goes further and reduces inequality by 36%, it could virtually eliminate extreme poverty.
India – along with all the other countries in the world – has committed to attaining the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030, and to ending extreme poverty by that year. But unless we make an effort to first contain and then reduce the rising levels of extreme inequality, the dream of ending extreme poverty for the 300 million Indians – a quarter of the population – who live below an extremely low poverty line, will remain a pipe dream.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda