An Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Oration during Julius CaesarGet Your
Starting at Just $13.90 a page
Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Oration “… Bear with me; / my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, / And I must pause till it come back to me. ” (JC III ii 47) Marc Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral was so cunning and powerful that it caused the crowd’s loyalties to sway. Prior to Marc Antony’s oration the crowd favored Brutus and the conspirators. However, Marc Antony’s compelling discourse caused the plebeians to support him, and not Brutus. Marc Antony used three literary devices during his funeral oration, rhetorical question, sarcasm, and repetition, to successfully persuade the crowd.
Although the crowd was supportive of the conspirators after Brutus’s speech, Marc Antony’s use of sarcasm in his funeral oration caused them to rethink who they should support. According to www. dictionary. com, sarcasm is ironic remarks used to gain someone’s attention and cause them to draw thoughts about someone of something. Marc Antony’s use of sarcasm during his discourse is evident in the following lines, ” For Brutus is an honourable man / So are they all, honourable men. ” (JC III ii 46) Sarcasm is also evident in these lines, “… I rather choose/ To wrong the dead, to wrong myself and you, / Than I will wrong such honourable men. (JC III ii 48)
The use of sarcasm was a crucial element in Marc Antony’s speech. It caused the crowd to start feeling more agreeable towards Marc Antony’s opinion than Brutus’s. The crowd’s opinion of Antony is evident in the following line; ” There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony. ” (JC III ii 47) As the crowd starts to listen more attentively to Marc Antony’s speech, Marc Antony begins to use rhetorical question. According to www. dictionary. com, a rhetorical question is a statement that is formulated as a question but that is not supposed to be answered.
Marc Antony’s use of rhetorical question is evident in the following lines, ” I thrice presented him a kingly crown, / Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition? (JC III ii 47) By rhetorically bringing to light the instance where Caesar refused the crown three times, it caused the crowd to rethink Brutus’s blatant accusation that Caesar was ambitious. It is obvious that the crowd has been persuaded to believe Antony in the following lines, “Mark’d ye his words? He would not take the crown; / Therefore ‘t is certain he was not ambitious. ” (JC III ii 47) Another clever element that Marc Antony uses in his oration is repetition.
According to www. dictionary. com, repetition is reiteration, or repeating the same word, or the same sense in different words, for the purpose of making a deeper impression on the audience. An instance where Marc Antony used repetition is in the following lines, “For Brutus is an honourable man; / So are they all, all honourable men. ” (JC III ii 46) During his speech Marc Antony repeats numerous times that Brutus “is an honourable man. ” Preceding this statement is usually a line contradicting Brutus’s honorability. An example of this is in the following lines, “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; / And Brutus is an honourable man. (JC III ii 47) Marc Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral was immensely effective.
He successfully caused the sentiment of the crowd to go from supporting Brutus and the conspirators, to supporting Caesar and himself. An example of where the plebeians loyalties lied before Marc Antony’s speech is apparent in the following lines, “Live, Brutus! Live, live! Let him be Caesar. ” (JC III ii 45) However, the crowd’s sentiments after Marc Antony was done is evident in the following lines, “We’ll burn the house of Brutus. Peace, ho! Hear Antony. Most noble Antony! ” (JC III ii 50)
Author: Brandon Johnson
An Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Oration during Julius Caesar
We have so large base of authors that we can prepare a unique summary of any book. Don't believe? Check it!
How fast would you like to get it?
Rhetorical Analysis of Earl Spencer's Speech for the Funeral of Lady Diana
571 Words3 Pages
In this assignment, I will closely analyse the speech made by Earl Spencer for the funeral of Lady Diana, considering the complicated context and literary devises he uses to affect his audience.
The speech was written as a funeral speech for Diana's close family and friends, but also, more importantly, for the public, as it was broadcasted worldwide.
In the speech, although it's primary purpose is to pay respects to his sister; he uses the opportunity to promote Diana's charity work, and to raise controversy within the royal family.
He never directly says it, but when analysing the text his feelings towards the royal family are apparent; from the fact that he mentions, " she needed no…show more content…
He uses lots of abstract nouns, to create an image of Diana e.g. "the very essence of compassion, of duty, of style, of beauty." The group of four descriptive words emphasises these images. He also uses metaphors, like "sparkle" which makes people think of light, a symbol of life and vitality.
He always refers to his sister as Diana, never as princess or Lady, which would be to formal, making it sound less emotional; but also never as "Di", which would be to informal and personal for a funeral speech aimed at so many.
Earl Spencer creates many contradicting images, which balance each other out. He often mentions religious references, "God granted you but half a life", "God given", "rush to canonise". This creates an angelic picture in the minds of the audience, which would seem exaggerated, but he also describes Diana as a human. "Insecure person".
This balance between contradictory images, and suitably formal writing style helps to make the speech so powerful.
He uses pronouns like "we", and "our" which unite the audience, making them feel like the whole nation is grieving with them.
The pronouns shift, as he speaks to Diana herself, "you brightened our lives", then again, towards then end of the speech, to "I". This makes it seem like he is releasing his own personal emotions, showing the side of Diana he knew. These changes in pronouns not only change